European History - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 3 Words: 886 Downloads: 5 Date added: 2017/09/20 Category History Essay Type Analytical essay Tags: Brexit Essay Did you like this example? In response to Russian Empire’s and Austria-Hungary’s declaration of war against each other after the assassination of Archduke Ferdinand of Austria, Germany declared war on Russia on August 1, 1914. Three days later, the German Reichstag declared Burgfrieden or â€Å"civil peace† which declared for people to set aside their conflicts aside and unite to defend the country. Most Germans expecting a rapid victory, enthusiastically supported the war. Their views, however, shifted from ebullience to one of detest. Opinions toward war all varied to each person. Some supported the war through the end, while some changed their view and wanted the war to end. In another perspective, some saw the war as an economic opportunity. Wars were series of repetitious events that occurred throughout the history of mankind. No matter how horrid they were, however, they brought a sense of unity among the people who were forced to unite to defend their home. When the decla ration of war had been made on August 1, 1914, the German Emperor Wilhelm II used words of eloquence to appeal to the citizens’ emotions to unite them together â€Å"like brothers† (Doc 1) in order to gain their support for the war. Much enthusiasm followed after his speech as depicted in the photograph (Doc. 2). Most people waved their hats, shouting words of praise to the emperor. Women felt gratefulness during the war in the beginning. They found it as an opportunity to expand the rights of a woman. They thought that with the victory of the war, they would become more equal to men. This idea was voiced in the editorial of the women’s rights advocate. (Doc. 4) Oskar Schmitz, and author, indirectly approved of the war by asserting that since Germany was united and strong, other countries such as England could not hope to defeat them (Doc. ). Although some supported for the war with no question, some grudgingly supported in fear of retribution and in hopes of gaining recognition. According to a Social Democratic Party newspaper, the democratic parties would have been â€Å"destroyed and crushed,† had they not voted to finance the war. Their agreement to finance the war was a gamble to secure their position in the government. (Doc. 3) No matter what their reasons to support the war, they followed the terms of the â€Å"civil peace† in the beginning. As the time progressed on, people began to realize the dragging war hurt hem more than benefit them. It was nothing new to those who realized the cost of the war in the beginning as S. Jobs, a columnist, noted. Among the rush of enthusiasm among the Berlin population, there were â€Å"a quiet, serious, even shaken group of people. † (Doc. 5) Both solemn and enthusiastic attitudes grew into frustration. A military administrator of a rural province reported to his superiors, which was formal and accurate, that one woman voiced her displeasure and refused to work for the gov ernment stating, â€Å"I can’t take it any more. (Doc 9) Evelyn Blucher von Wahlstatt accounted in her diary—which was unbiased because of the private information in the diary—that she heard the complaints of women in the streets. Those women were starving and lost their husbands in the war; loss of their husband also meant the loss of income to support the family. (Doc 8) Those who had enough of the war formed a radical labor party. They made a list of demands to the government to end the war and to ease the burden of their economic problems according to a police report in Berlin. While the majority of the citizens of Germany bickered amongst themselves if they should continue to support the war, those of rich and powerful took an advantage of the war for economic benefits. They coaxed the citizens that workers had the power to influence the outcome of the war by working harder and by trying to sound patriotic. One of those who used that excuse was General Wilhelm Groener, who was the Army Chief of Staff, proclaiming to the workers to â€Å"work and more work until the victorious end of the war. † A german soldier showed his abhorrence toward these opportunists in the National Liberal Party paper. He said, â€Å"The blood rises to our heads when we imagine that, behind the front, turncoats are exploiting our inhuman sacrifices to fill their sacks with gold, and that they are enriching themselves at the expense of our women and children. † (Doc. 7) Once again a wife of a farmer in Doc. 9 declared to the military administrator that she was not going â€Å"to slave away† for the Berliners, implying that those Berliners only took an advantage of the war for their gain. The cartoon in Doc. 12 also indicates people’s distaste for the opportunists. The two fat figures indicate the wealthy that came from the cities (as depicted in the background). The fatness could represent all the gains those men have gotte n from the lower middle class. The lower middleclass is represented by a thin, malnourished man whose resources were â€Å"sucked away† by those wealthy people. The â€Å"civil peace† was to attract the supports for the war. It was successful in the beginning but as the time passed, its policy failed as people resented it. At the end, everyone was dissatisfied with their defeat in the war and the harsh terms that came as the consequences. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "European History" essay for you Create order

Is Abortion Moral Or Moral - 1018 Words

When the beginning of life actually occurs is clearly not a topic to be taken lightly in today’s modern world. Majority of the population’s answers to this question are based on each individuals opinion and is supported by what they believe. In general, there are two sides of the argument. One is that life begins at the time of conception. The other belief is that life doesn’t begin until the drawing of the first breath. The true dilemma here is not the accurate pinpointing of life’s beginning, but the questions that accompany this topic and each individuals desire to do the right thing, the moral thing. While one point of view allows for abortion the other does not. The issue raises many questions of morality. Is abortion moral? When does it become murder? When is it permissible? (Life of the mother at stake / A product of rape). Should it be the mother’s choice? Many arguments for both sides pull from scripture and scientific articulations. Depending on ones individual view, scripture has been used for the theological argument of either side. Those who advocate that life begins at the time of fertilization tend to pull from verses such as Jeremiah 1:5 which states, â€Å"Before you were formed in your mothers womb, I chose you. Before you were born I set you apart...†. Others relate to the story in Luke 1:39-45, which Mary (mother of Jesus) met Elizabeth (mother of John). Elizabeth explained she could feel John leap inside her, due to the presence ofShow MoreRelatedAbortion and Morals1547 Words   |  7 PagesThe Immorality of Abortion Religion, personal rights, or science normally fuels the debate on abortion. However abortion can be looked at philosophically and debated whether it is moral or immoral. In this paper I will argue that abortion is immoral because it deprives the zygote from any future life. In The Journal of Philosophy, Don Marquis argues in his essay, â€Å"Why Abortion is Immoral† that abortion is wrong because it deprives the fetus of a ‘future like ours’Read MoreAbortion : Ethical And Moral1495 Words   |  6 PagesAbortion Introduction Is it ethical and moral to have an abortion? The definition of abortion is â€Å"deliberate removal or deliberate action to cause the expulsion of a fetus from the womb of a human female, at the request of or through the agency of the mother, so as in fact to result in the death of the fetus† (Merriam-Webster, 2016). What about the morality of un-coerced, human abortion for our purposes abortions are voluntary, deliberate removals of a human fetus (Objections to Warren, 2016)Read MoreThe Moral Issue Of Abortion987 Words   |  4 PagesMoral Issue of Abortion There are many moral topics people can chose to debate about. One of the most popular ones is abortion and whether it is morally right or if it is morally wrong. Personally I believe abortion is morally wrong. The main reason is taking another persons life. There are many causes and outcomes that can take place. First, the main point of sexual intercourse is reproduction so if the two people create a child they are morally in charge of protecting the new life being createdRead MoreThe Moral Issue Of Abortion Essay1134 Words   |  5 PagesThe moral issue that is selected in the essay is about abortion. Abortion a standard ethical issue often discussed in moral philosophy. It is a matter that is raised when talking about issues of the beginning of life. The biggest problem that surrounds this concerns the life of the fetus or the unborn child. On whether it has a right to life or whether the mother of the unborn fetus has a right to terminate it or not. A lot of controversies has su rrounded this area of the debate, and it is the basisRead MoreThe Moral Permissibility Of Abortion974 Words   |  4 PagesMoral Permissibility of Abortion Abortion has been a debating issue for many decades. Most of the countries, permit abortion, however, some religions and countries consider abortion to be morally and ethically impermissible. In Canada, the abortion was legalized in 1988 based on the fact that the law should not force a women to carry a fetus beyond her priorities as it would interfere with her body and her own securities towards life. Many would argue against this view by stating that a fetus doesRead MoreAbortion is Moral Essay1017 Words   |  5 Pageslife marked by such severe oppression. Drawing on the views of Rosalind Hursthouse regarding virtue ethics and abortion, and applying her ideas to the aforementioned scenario, we can assess how virtue theory would deliberate this particular moral problem. Hursthouses theory, in application to this scenario, should stand up to criticism without weakening its application to morals. Abortion, when considered with the â€Å"right attitude† and carried out for good reason given the circumstances, can be theRead MoreMoral Standing on Abortion1087 Words   |  5 PagesMarch 2014 Moral Standing on Abortion To say that a person has moral standing is to give consideration to his or her wellbeing. According to Robert M. Veatch’s The Basic of Bioethics, moral standing is believed to be â€Å"that humans (at least normal humans) have moral standing [as well as] other animals† (27). Moral standing is determined by the physical or mental capacities of self-awareness or rationality. However, controversy arises when determining when one actually has full moral standing. AbortionRead MoreThe Moral Permissibility Of Abortion Essay1485 Words   |  6 PagesThe moral permissibility of abortion other than if necessary to save the life of the mother does not depend on whether the fetus is a person. This essay examines the argument to why abortion is morally permissible and defends this notion using three central impressions, to which the essay is organized by the following: first, abortion does not depend on whether the fetus is a person, because the fetus is not a person. Second, the moral permissibility of abortion cannot be exclusively contingent inRead MoreAbortion is Not Moral Essay1037 Words   |  5 Pages Abortion; as defined by Merriam-Webster dictionary is, â€Å"the termination of a pregnancy after, accompanied by, resulting in, or closely followed by the death of the embryo or fetus. This is the definition of abortion of which I will be reviewing its ethical status. After Roe vs Wade, the supreme court simultaneously decided that women have the right of privacy under the 14th amendment; making it acceptable to abort a pregnancy within the first trimester (Vaughn 119). The main argument on abortionRead MoreIs Abortion A Moral Thing?844 Words   |  4 PagesWhen it comes to the ongoing debate on whether abortion is a moral thing to do or not, it is often hard to come to a conclusion on which way of thinking is right or wrong or if any way of thinking is wrong to begin with. In the case of Immanuel Kant’s various arguments in the novel Ground for the metaphysics of morals, I believe that Kant would feel that it would be a morally permissible thing to do to abort a fetus, a nd I feel this way due to his opinions on the differences between a person and

Personal Health Record Systems

Question: Discuss about the Personal Health Record Systems. Answer: Introduction: Patient-centered care forms a strong pillar of a high-performance and high-quality health care system. One approach of doing this is through personal health records (PHRs) of the patients. PHR is an evolving patient-centric model of health information interchange. PHRs are an important tool that empower patients and stimulate right decisions and actions in healthcare. Electronic PHRs offer patients a precipitate of their health records and the care they were provided so that they can reference it in the future when needed. Moreover, if the PHR data is managed accurately and clinical analysis is done properly, the large quantities of data (big data) can provide gleaning new insights from its clinical analysis by providing unique opportunities to reduce the costs of health care, readmissions, triage, decompensation, adverse events, and optimization of treatment for diseases disturbing multiple organ systems. Thus, hospitals and clinics should adopt and use health information technology in the entire health care delivery system to improve patient access to their personal health records. The following strategies may be helpful in this process: Introduction of Electronic Medical Records (EMRs): EMRs assemble, stock, and display patient information using computerized medical information systems. They allow creation of readable and systematized recordings and access to clinical information related to individual patients. Escalating the use of interoperable electronic health record (EHR) systems for the advancement of health care delivery should, in fact, be a national policy priority. The hitching of a PHR to an EMR may aid in speeding the dispersal of integrated PHRs. Arranging for the technical requirements, support, and assistance: EHR use requires some user and system characteristics, support from others, and many organizational and environment organizers. Communication strategies and technology features have key insinuations in the management of PHR enactments. The health records should be shared between patients and their providers by means of self-administered functions to support sustainable use of the system. Adoption and rate of usage may also be affected by the accessibility of enough office staff for hands-on training along with support in the elucidation of medical information. Personal health record systems (PHRS) should be developed such that it can facilitate patients can access their health data anytime, anywhere in the world. PHRS also offers many features to help the providers in involving, educating, and empowering patients, thereby making proactive and preventive care a reality. Accelerate technology adoption: The physician and patent adoption of basic EHR can be increased by enhancing their computational capabilities through adequate training related to a basic EHR system. A training and support team should be available for keeping the data secure (as the data is outsourced to a third party, such as cloud providers, but should be kept private by encryption), accurate (wrong information can lead to wrong information leading to wrong decisions), updated (updating the information is very important). Patient activation: Health literacy of the patient plays and important role in the use of PHR. The health literacy level of the patient describes how well the patient understands resources delivered by doctors or other providers. Numerous factors, such as qualification level, income, and age, determine health literacy of the patients. Patient interpretation and understanding of the information is still not well understood. But there is need to address it completely and overcome it to realize the full potential of PHRs. So, there is need to address patients intention to use PHR systems which are influenced by system-related factors, such as alleged usefulness, health information understanding, personalization, communication support, and user-related factors, such as culture, disease state, societal influence, self-efficacy, and readiness to share. Patients need to be educated, especially in case of chronic diseases, about the importance of PHR. In case of a chronic illness, it improve s both health and financial outcomes, as more frequent and impactful interactions are possible using PHR with both current patients and those at risk of developing a chronic condition. So, patients need to adopt the transformation of healthcare organizations from a system based exclusively on in-person interactions to a system that uses digital solutions for supporting physician-patient interactions irrespective of the patients or physicians location. Provider satisfaction: The provider needs to be updated about the benefits and use of technology through proper training. Both positive and negative financial incentives may also influence the rate of physicians adoption of EHR systems. The meaningful-use of this technology should be demonstrated by the physicians and providers. References Agarwal R, Anderson C, Zarate J, Ward C. If We Offer it, Will They Accept? Factors Affecting Patient Use Intentions of Personal Health Records and Secure Messaging. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(2):e43. Bates DW, Saria S, Ohno-Machado L, Shah A, Escobar G. Big Data In Health Care: Using Analytics To Identify And Manage High-Risk And High-Cost Patients. Health Aff (Millwood). 2014 Jul 1;33(7):112331. Hsiao C-J, Jha AK, King J, Patel V, Furukawa MF, Mostashari F. Office-Based Physicians Are Responding To Incentives And Assistance By Adopting And Using Electronic Health Records. Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Jul 9;10.1377/hlthaff.2013.0323. Jung SY, Lee K, Hwang H, Yoo S, Baek HY, Kim J. Support for Sustainable Use of Personal Health Records: Understanding the Needs of Users as a First Step Towards Patient-Driven Mobile Health. JMIR MHealth UHealth. 2017;5(2):e19. Prashad R. The Role of Personal Health Record Systems in Chronic Disease Management. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2017;234:2759. Barriers for Adopting Electronic Health Records (EHRs) by Physicians - ProQuest [Internet]. [cited 2017 Mar 19]. Available from: https://search.proquest.com/openview/2a2b74d6984003a3d062b94d592e59ff/1?pq-origsite=gscholarcbl=1216391 The Impact of Health Literacy on a Patients Decision to Adopt a Personal Health Record - ProQuest [Internet]. [cited 2017 Mar 19]. Available from: https://search.proquest.com/openview/9ba21e31a1a04ffa1fb46035d9373c88/1?pq-origsite=gscholarcbl=51400 Ozok AA, Wu H, Gurses AP. Exploring Patients Use Intention of Personal Health Record Systems: Implications for Design. Int J HumanComputer Interact. 2017 Apr 3;33(4):26579.

Nixon His Cover-Up Essays - Watergate Scandal, American Quakers

Nixon: His Cover-Up Nixon: His Cover-up Who would have knew a U.S. President would have done a crime? Unless it was a good reason that is. This incident is called the Watergate scandal. At the Watergate Hotel in Washington D.C. was where this all started. This led to even more complications. In this paper I hope to prove that even though Nixon had a cover-up plan it failed to succeed. In order to accomplish this several questions come to mind: Was Nixon trying to hide anything? Where there any evidence that Nixon had committed a crime? What proof did the detectives have? Did Nixons plan end up failing? Richard Milhous Nixon was born in 1913 in Yorba Linda, California, the second of five sons of Francis Anthony Nixon and Hannah Milhous Nixon (Nixon). Richard Nixon went to a public school in Whittier, California. After graduating he went to Whittier College, a Quaker institution, where he majored in history (Bowmen). Whittier was also where he met his future wife Thelma Pat Ryan. They got married on June 21, 1940, and had two daughters: Patricia, born in 1946, and Julie, born in 1948 (Lexicon). Nixon had many political roles. In 1946 Nixon became a congressman persuaded by Californias Republicans. Then in 1950 he became a member of the U.S. Senate from California (Nixon). Nixon with his running partner, Dwight D. Eisenhower, was elected to be the Vice President in 1952. And then they both were reelected for another term in 1956 (Lexicon). After that Nixons last term of Vice President he ran for President against John F. Kennedy. This election was one of the closest elections in U.S. history. Kennedy won by only 112,803 votes. After his defeat Nixon returned to California and ran for Governor and lost once again (Bowmen). So now Nixon had a break from political offices. But now, in 1968 Nixon ran for President once again against Hubert H. Humphrey and was successful. And once his first term was over Nixon ran and won the Presidency again (Lexicon). Now during his second term, however, was consumed by the Watergate Scandal (Nixon). Watergate was a major United States political scandal that started with the burglary and wiretapping of the Democratic Partys campaign headquarters (Genovese 6). And then started to create President Nixon and many of his supporters in even more illegal acts, and ended up with the first resignation of a U.S. President. The burglary was on June 17, 1972, by five men who were caught in the offices of the Democratic National Committee at the Watergate apartment and office in Washington, D.C. Their arrest uncovered that the White House was a part of espionage against political opponents (Lexicon). One main factor of the cover-up was the tapes. The taping system was a system that automatically recorded all conversations, which meant that the tapes would tell if Nixon was involved in the burglary and cover-up (Lexicon). In July 1973 was when White House aide Alexander Butterfield told the committee, on nationwide television, that there was a taping system that Nixon ordered installed in the White House. Then Archibald Cox immediately asked for the tapes to be revealed in court (Nixon). But Nixon refused to give them up. He was claiming executive privilege, saying they were vital to the national security (Nixon). Which let him hide certain documents because he didnt want to loose the presidency (Bowmen). This grew more doubts about Nixons integrity. On July 24, the Supreme Court voted 8-0 in the United States v. Nixon that Nixon must turn over the tapes (Nixon). Then the Judiciary Committee looked into impeaching Nixon (Bowmen). And on July 29 and 30, 1974, the House Judiciary Co mmittee had three articles of impeachment, charging Nixon with misusing his power in order to violate the constitutional rights of U.S. citizens, obstructing justice in the Watergate affair, and defying Judiciary Committee subpoenas (Genovese 27). And the next day Nixon agreed to give in the tapes, but soon after, it was found that some of the tapes had been edited and the key parts of one had been erased (Nixon). Now this brought even more complications for President Nixon. During this madness there were many people that gave up. The year of 1973 was the